Propaganda Techniques¶
This page describes the 23 persuasion techniques detected by the pipeline. Each entry lists the technique name, its internal runner identifier, and a description based on the annotation guidelines from the JRC Technical Report “Annotation Guidelines for Propaganda Techniques” (JRC132862).
Technique |
Runner |
Description |
|---|---|---|
Repetition |
|
Repeating the same message over and over again so that the audience will eventually accept it. |
Exaggeration / Minimisation |
|
Either representing something in an excessive manner, or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is. |
Obfuscation |
|
Using words which are deliberately not clear so that the audience may have its own interpretations. |
Loaded Language |
|
Using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. |
Whataboutism |
|
A technique that attempts to discredit an opponent’s position by charging them with hypocrisy without directly disproving their argument. |
Kairos |
|
Exploiting a specific moment in time by presenting arguments as uniquely urgent or timely, pressuring audiences to act immediately by suggesting that the opportunity or crisis is fleeting and will not return. |
Conversation Killer |
|
Words or phrases (thought-terminating clichés) that discourage critical thought and meaningful discussion about a given topic. |
Slippery Slope |
|
Arguing that one event will inevitably lead to increasingly negative consequences, assuming a direct causal chain without sufficient evidence between an initial action and an extreme endpoint. |
Slogan |
|
A brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. |
Appeal to Values |
|
Connecting a message to deeply held beliefs or principles valued by the audience—such as patriotism, family, or justice—to encourage support without necessarily addressing logical arguments. |
Red Herring |
|
Introducing irrelevant material to the issue being discussed, so that everyone’s attention is diverted away from the points made. |
Straw Man |
|
An opponent’s proposition is substituted with a similar one which is then refuted in place of the original proposition. |
Appeal to Fear / Prejudice |
|
Seeking to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and/or panic in the population towards an alternative. |
Appeal to Authority |
|
Stating that a claim is true simply because a valid authority or expert on the issue said it was true, without any other supporting evidence offered. |
Bandwagon |
|
Attempting to persuade the target audience to join in and take the course of action because everyone else is taking the same action. |
Casting Doubt |
|
Questioning the credibility or character of an opponent in order to undermine their argument without engaging with its substance. |
Flag Waving |
|
Playing on strong national feeling (or loyalty to any group, e.g. race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea. |
Smear / Poisoning the Well |
|
An effort to damage or call into question someone’s reputation by propounding negative propaganda before they have a chance to speak. |
Tu Quoque |
|
Literally “you too”: deflects criticism by pointing out similar or worse behavior by opponents rather than defending against the accusation, claiming moral inconsistency. |
Guilt by Association |
|
Persuading an audience to disapprove of an action or idea by suggesting that it is popular with groups held in contempt by the target audience. |
Name Calling / Labeling |
|
Applying derogatory or emotionally charged labels to individuals or groups in order to provoke fear, hatred, or contempt without engaging with their actual positions. |
Causal Oversimplification |
|
Assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue, including transferring blame to one person or group without investigating the complexities. |
False Dilemma |
|
Presenting two alternative options as the only possibilities when in fact more possibilities exist (black-and-white fallacy). |